The moon landing and other conspiracy theories

Skeptics might say …
Skeptics might say that because there are similarities in the background of some of the footage that they used the same backdrop to hoax there shot. Who’s to say that the hills weren’t far away and just look similar in different spots?

My favorite way to debunk this conspiracy is the fact that you can see the flag up there using a good telescope. I’d like to see you critics try and explain that one away

well said.
well said.

In order for the …
In order for the hoax theorists to be correct, NASA dangled the astronauts from wires in an impossibly large vacuum environment and videod them in slow motion under an unfeasibly bright single spotlight. NASA workers would have to keep their secret for 40 years and the astronauts be deserving of oscars. Governments, scientists and technicians the world over would also have to be in on it especially America’s arch enemy, the Soviets, who would know tv & radio signals were not being transmitted.

lunar observatory

…
lunar observatory

the moon hoax advocates nightmare

how lame…
how lame…

the apollo …
the apollo adventures, Vietnam, 9/11, just to name a few… I don’t think people believe these things because there is any truth or ’scientific evidence’, (so called), I think certain people “bElieve” these things because of certain insecurities. Their belief is directly proportionate to their fear. They have become conditioned (brainwashed) into believing their leaders; and to never question authority. Science isn’t a factor at all (orbital mechanics, give me a break!)

you have a mind …
you have a mind virus you suffer from delusion you are a retard you come across as a bit thick.

this guy talks …
this guy talks about evidence why is he so willing to beleive they landed on the moon because NASA said it that is not science this guy is a retard he has a mind virus

Speak English …
Speak English jackass

silly puppet!!! Its …
silly puppet!!! Its people like you who shouldn’t have kids, its like the blind leading the blind know wonder the powers that be can place the biggest super power on the planet in the hands of a wit like BUSH, i could be pissed, high as on coke & still have more commen since then you…

Wow, you can quote …
Wow, you can quote the bible.

How about quoting something about orbital mechanics?

Apollo, on the …
Apollo, on the other hand, was sent to the moon’s orbit, on an intercepting orbit. It didn’t have to play “catch up”. It merely had to have the moon’s gravity capture them.
Also, by your own logic, Pioneer 10 must’ve been fake, because it only took THAT probe 11 hours to leave the Earth-moon system.
New Horizons took less time. So, why are these missions fake?

Your ignorance of …
Your ignorance of orbital mechanics is evidence.
The shuttle goes 185 miles UP. But that does not take into account the distance over the Earth it covers. Basically, it must catch up with the space station, which is in it’s own orbit. The shuttle is sent to match the ISS’s orbit.

What we have here …
What we have here is a testbook case of Puff confusing knowledge with ignorance.

Puff: “I dont understand why the flighttimes are different, my McJob cohorts cant explain it, and NASA has never sent a personal rep to my door to explain it, therefore they’re all evil and I’m so smart.”

There’s a reason they teach this stuff in college you know.

Advanced Newtonian orbital momentum and acceleration went over Puffs head? I cant imagine why…

Puff, if you’re …
Puff, if you’re honestly a Mcjob stupid enough to think a several thousand ton space vehicle is just an overgrown BOTTLE ROCKET, and NASA says:
“The space station is almost here, almost…almost… FIRE!”
Then you are every bit the lunatic retard I think you are.

The space shuttle ORBITS.
It orbits DOZENS OF TIMES before reaching the space station. APOLLO DIDNT.
Was READING about the Shuttle’s path too hard? Even know what an “orbit” is? Cause at this point I’d bet good money you dont…

66 hours to reach …
66 hours to reach the Space Station which is a mere 185 miles above the Earth.

NASA claims apollo 13 was “55 hours” into its duration from “lift off” when it encountered a problem at a distance of “200,000 miles”… The moon is 250 000 miles away!

66 hours -> 185 miles shuttle to station
55 hours -> 200 000 miles 4/5ths to the moon

So, it took apollo ten hours less to travel 199 815 thousand miles more!?

R i i i i i i i i i g h t….
(your an idiot, now off)

Fact is about the …
Fact is about the Shuttle vs Apollo tom-foolery, you’re making incredibly naive assumptions:

1) EVEN if they were both going to the same place, they still took different routes to get there.
2) Even if the routes were identical, the engine thrusts were not.
3) Even if the thrusts were identical, the ENGINES were not (rocket boosters vs 3 stage Saturn).
4) Even if the engines were the same, the MASS was not.

Did I lose you already?

Fact is, your …
Fact is, your stupidity on the flight-time issue speaks for itself. To be so ignorant as to not know that Apollo and the Shuttle had different strength engines and different orbits, well– how can you expect us to take you seriously? That was a fuck-up of COLOSSAL proportions.

Its not a disgrace to admit what the rest of us already know, that you have never opened a physics book in your life, and only cut and paste from the ignorant kook sites. Just admit that and we can start fresh.

And you’re here to …
And you’re here to say that one idiot “exchanging ideas” with another idiot somehow makes them both smarter? That two wrongs DO make a right? You’re too dumb to think that maybe like-minded paranoid people like surround themselves with yes-men? And that uneducated people NEVER admit they’re uneducated?

The fact is, you dont have anything “indisputable” except the fact that everything you say here gets shot down (by more educated people) with pathetic ease. That speaks for itself.

“So what?”
YOU …
“So what?”
YOU BROUGHT IT UP! And dropped it like a atomic potato when you had your not-so-educated handed to you. You didnt know ANYTHING about orbital paths or flight plans for two seperate vehicles going two seperate places, and you’re making the same totally oblivious stupid mistake again.

The Shuttle ORBITS DOZENS of times before reaching the space station. Apollo didnt. That honestly goes over your head? (Cant imagine why…)

But thou, O Daniel, …
But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

Daniel 12: 4

In 69, the public …
In 69, the public had no means of exchanging thoughts and ideas on the scale we are doing now. What the average person believied in 69 we don’t know because it was not recorded. TV and radio were owned by the corporations, like they are now, and what was heard and seen was selected by the few who seek to control the many. If anyone wanted to yell ‘FAKE’ and was willing to provide the undistiputable evidence we have now to support this hoax, they would have not been given the ‘air’ time to do it.

It isn’t science; …
It isn’t science; it is ‘professed’ science. As for the shuttle and the saturn rockets having ‘different’ engines, orbits flight plans etc, so what? That is quite obvious. nevertheless, it takes the shuttle at least 66 hours to reach the space station. apollo 13 was only 55 hours into its flight and was already 200,000 miles away!? apollo 13 never really happen (except in cinema) the difference in times vs distances was simply a miscalculation by the deceivers. apollo 13 never left earths orbit.

Your biggest …
Your biggest problem Puff, is that whenever any of us have mentioned “science,” you run screaming like a little girl.

Remember when you said Apollo was fake cause the travel times werent the same as the Space Shuttle?
I brought up several facts you avoided, different engines, different orbits, different flightplans, and you had no response? You dropped the whole thing hoping we’d all forget how dumb you made yourself look?
Well we didnt forget, and you were the idiot.

People question the …
People question the Apollo landings ONLY because the Internet has no gatekeeper. ANY idiot can post any idiot webpage he feels like, and the average joe cant differentiate between the legitimate scientist and the kook in his basement. Since hundreds of idiots have posted webpages, you gullibly think that counts as “evidence,” even though most of these sites just recycle each others manure.
A dumb idea is still a dumb idea no matter how many websites it has.