18

Aug

9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked

Posted by admin as conspiracy theories

To support the controlled-demolition theory, conspiracy theorists attack the official NIST report by insisting that fire doesn’t melt steel. What NIST actually does claim is that the fires were sufficient enough to weaken the steel to the point where they would fail - structurally. This video attempts to debunk the 9/11 conspiracy theorists one at a time.

Duration : 0:3:55


[youtube oXxynEDpwrA]

 Mail this post

THEN EXPLAIN ME …
THEN EXPLAIN ME fall of bulding 7 ??

and explain me a tones of moulten steel on bottoms of all 3 towers please.

GUYS DONT BE STUPID.
go and watch Richard Gages movies and u will learn something.

I Am Not In this to …
I Am Not In this to for vengeance or to bring someone to justice but I Am A Warrior for Humanity & fighting nazism to keep America & the rest of the word free Is part of It & the laws of physics says that a 767 hitting the WTC could Not cause the 47 vertical Steel beams to collapse.

When I was a Child …
When I was a Child I was forced to go to a southern Baptist Church but I Read The KJV Bible Myself & learned most Churches don’t Read very well, I learned about the children of satan that set themselves up In high government. & u know something u Conspiracy debunkers might be more believable If u were Not a bunch of naiz type stripping Us of Our freedom all the time just ur attitude along give u away who u r.

There are videos on …
There are videos on YouTube of People blowing up Propane tanks but not of them make a shock wave that could knock a Fireman down from 100 feet away.

WulfgarCommand says August 18th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

Conspiracy: an evil …
Conspiracy: an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot. The official story IS a conspiracy theory!!!!! Whoever believes it, is a conspiracy theorist too and they don’t even know it.

nyrangers123456 says August 18th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

people u guys r …
people u guys r stupid if u beleive these 9/11 consparacy theories the sounds of explusions were not bombs they were probly stuff inside the building blowing up under heat did u ever think of that! PEOPLE JUST DROP IT

MOLTEN SLAG, Nuff …
MOLTEN SLAG, Nuff said

quantumcahill says August 18th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

you are forgetting …
you are forgetting about the near free-fall collapse of the towers and the loud, periodic explosions heard by our brave firefighters. if the steel beams were weakened by fire (which they can’t) it still should have fallen at a much slower pace. It fell in roughly 15 secs…near freefall speeds. Please explain building 7 and the fact that after a real terrorist attack had been diagnosed, that a rouge aircratft could still enter the most protected airspace in the world…the pentagon.

this is of anybodys …
this is of anybodys fault in our governments, Clintons, instead of using some of that so called “surplus money” he made for this country on a full fledged attack on Afghanistan to take out Osama in his early years of terrorism, before he got real big with Al Quaeda, and ultimately launched a terrorist attack on America.

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE …
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB

MrJackall No,you …
MrJackall No,you never said that but you did mention that when someone uses the term “idiot” to describe some of these conspiracy guys THAT person sounds less than intelligent. That is what I was responding to and I was making my case for using THAT term.Otherwise,you sound like a reasonable person to me.

Did I suggest that …
Did I suggest that 9/11 is an illusion? No, it happened, I cant deny that. The question is why 9/11 happened like it happened. That question cant be properly answered by the official government statements. Part of that is to be blamed because the government didn’t allow proper investigation teams in the crime area. Why dont they want it properly investigated? Because they want to hide something. What do they want to hide? That IS the big question indeed my friend.

Actually, if Anyone …
Actually, if Anyone has studied civil engineering, then there is a general rule,which they follow, any building above 5 stories has to be designed for Impact from jet planes and should be able to sustain high temperature fires.

Sorry MrJackall but …
Sorry MrJackall but I don’t know what else to call someone who believes an illusion is what hit the buildings other than an idiot.

testing..
testing..

(continued) Many …
(continued) Many buildings much closer to WTC1&2 were much more damaged but they stood tall. Explain that too please. I dont have the answers, but you shouldn’t exclude anything if you are looking for the truth, including the possibility of a false-flag operation. Do more research before you put these kind of movies online please, ty.

its highly unlikely …
its highly unlikely that all of the steel core columns would have collapsed, it is to be expected that at least some of them would have survived, you shouldnt underestimate the design of the WTC, the people who designed WTC werent dumb, they considered possible air crashes very early in their designs. Moreover this video doesnt explain anything about the fall of WTC7. Why did WTC7 crash down? It wasnt even hit by a plane. (continued)

Good questions. I …
Good questions. I don’t claim to believe or know anything but it does beg to wonder. Why would a tower hit so high collapse completely? There may be a perfectly good reason that I don’t know about, but it is a good question.

Thank you for this …
Thank you for this video. I try to keep an open mind and listen to all sides. It’s nice to have this point brought across scientifically instead of the normal and unhelpful name calling that comes from most people. Words like idiot or worse do nothing to prove a point and only serve to make the user sound less than intelligent. Instead you present actual facts. Thank you for doing so.

Yes,that is really …
Yes,that is really illustrated when those idiots try to tell me that it was an illusion and not a real plane that hit the buildings. That one really takes the cake. lol

The conspiracy …
The conspiracy theorists are so blind by their ideology they dismiss anyone presenting facts and logic at the same time telling those they disagree with to have an open mind. Keep drinking the kool aid.

Hey cantaffordit, …
Hey cantaffordit,where is the proof of thermite? I’d really like to know!Do you mean the picture of the beam that was cut by an iron worker,the molten material poring out of one of the towers or what?

BizzyBumpyWilson says August 18th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

so did u get 2 …
so did u get 2 watch wut i askd u 2 watch?…”painful deceptionz”

This doesn’t do …
This doesn’t do anything to help proove anything, rather show that whoever made this video is just taking an easy way out, maybe an american too proud to admit that american’s very well may have attacked there own. For starters, the north tower i believe it was was hit so high up, why did the whole thing implode. dont tell me it was just weight coming down on itself, it wouldnt have come down so perfectly. Thermate was present, as is evidence for explosives on base core structures. open ur mind

Holy shit, someone …
Holy shit, someone finally made a video explaining the entire thing in a concise and accurate fashion, applying the principles of architecture and structural engineering to arrive at a proper conclusion. Favs list, so I can link it from those dumbass truther videos. Thank you!

Leave a Comment:

Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Message
Valid &